Focus and Scope
Food Technologies
Additives/ingredients/functional food
, Packaging/handling,
Supply and transport technologies,
Storage technologies/preservatives,
Process for optimisation of food quality/quantity,
Biotechnology
Food Quality and Safety
Detection and analysis methods,
Microbiology/toxicology methods,
Traceability and Safe production methods
Nutrition and Health Products
Nutrition and diets
, Phytodrugs,
Nutraceuticals,
Diagnostics
Food Service Management
Systems for food production,
Food and restaurant operations,
Supply and distribution chain,
Food communities and societies,
Revenue management, human resources, training, marketing of food
Food Bio-resources Technology
Feed system to support food resources,
Animal/cattle handling in term of supplying food safety and food security,
Farm management and technology on producing high quality of food resources
Bio-energy resources and waste/byproduct
Waste/byproduct management and process,
Process for optimising bio-energy production
Section Policies
Review
Review articles are only accepted upon invitation by the editorial board and will still be subject to the same review process required of regular submissions
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Research Article
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Research Articles
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Summary Research
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Peer Review Process
All published articles in Journal of Applied Food Technology manuscript must be passed through peer review process.
The submitted manuscript is firstly reviewed by editorial team. It will be evaluated in the office whether it is suitable with focus and scope or not. Manuscripts that do not meet this criteria are returned to the authors within one week of receipt. Every submitted manuscript which passes this step will be checked to identify any plagiarism before being reviewed by reviewers. Regarding the plagiarism, editorial team will be used plagiarism checker and Google Scholar network.
Manuscripts that pass the initial review are assigned to an Associate Editor, who selects several referees based on their expertise in that particular field. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two referees under a double-blind peer review process, where both the referees and the authors are kept anonymous. Referees are asked to evaluate the manuscript based on its originality, soundness of methodology, impact to design research, and relevance to design practices. To facilitate timely publication, referees are asked to complete their reviews within three weeks. After collecting the referees' reports, the Associate Editor makes a recommendation on the acceptability of the manuscript to the Editor-in-Chief.
Based on the referees' comments and the Associate Editor's recommendation, the Editor-in-Chief makes a final decision on the acceptability of the manuscript and communicates to the authors the decision, along with referees' reports. The final decision can be "Accept Submission", "Revisions Required", "Resubmit for Review", "Resubmit Elsewhere", or "Decline Submission." A revised manuscript should be re-submitted within six months of the decision. It will usually be returned to the original referees for evaluation.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Archiving
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...
The content of journal is also stored at National Library of Indonesian (http://www.perpusnas.go.id).